Don’t forget to sign the e-petition calling on the Queensland government to do whatever it takes to ensure that the waste facility is not placed in Queensland.
http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/work-of-assembly/petitions/e-petition?PetNum=2564
Don’t forget to sign the e-petition calling on the Queensland government to do whatever it takes to ensure that the waste facility is not placed in Queensland.
http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/work-of-assembly/petitions/e-petition?PetNum=2564
A ‘flag of convenience’ vessel registered in Antigua and chartered by a French company arriving in the dead of night to unload Australian nuclear waste returned from France highlights the dangers of transporting nuclear material and is yet more evidence that waste should be securely stored on site, the Australian Greens said today.
“The Australian Government seems determined to undermine public confidence in its handling of spent nuclear fuel,” Australian Greens Acting Leader and Nuclear Issues Spokesperson Senator Scott Ludlam said today.
“Twenty five tonnes of waste was offloaded at Port Kembla, requiring a massive police presence to secure the arrival and transport it back to Lucas Heights. With extraordinary revelations about irregularities in the shipping process, one thing is clear: once the last Australian waste has returned, this practice must stop,” Senator Ludlam said.
“Most alarming is that a ship that failed inspections in the U.S. was used to transport the waste back here. Waste should be kept in the existing location, and we should stop making more of it.
“Particle accelerators can produce the medical isotopes we need more safely and cheaply than a reactor. This is not an industry we need, and the reaction to these transports demonstrate that it’s not an industry the community wants. The government should move to ensure that we do not ever need to undergo these sorts of risks again.
Australian civil society groups have called on the Federal Government to take a new approach to the vexed issue of radioactive waste management.
In an open letter to federal Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane national environment groups, the ACTU, public health and Aboriginal representatives have urged the Minister to move away from a search for a postcode for a remote dump in favour of a credible and open examination of the range of management options.
The groups’ letter states:
For over two decades, successive Australian governments have sought to manage Australia’s radioactive waste inventory through the development of a co-located remote central dump and store. This approach has repeatedly failed to win social license and has been characterised by division, contest and the inability of the Commonwealth to realise a site. There is no reason to think that repeating this approach in a new place would lead to a different outcome and seeking site nominations from communities that often suffer extensive economic disadvantage risks placing many in an invidious position. The approach taken to date on radioactive waste management has led to a polarisation of views and a lack of the consensus and discourse required to realise lasting solutions.
“As health practitioners we see that Australia now has both a real chance and the clear need to avoid another sweep it under the carpet response to our nuclear waste problem,” said Dr Peter Tait of the Public Health Association of Australia.
“A national inquiry into the long term, responsible management of Australia’s nuclear waste is overdue and necessary.”
The Federal Government has indicated its intention to start a national search for a waste site from early November.
“Industrial waste and its management is a serious issue that requires genuine and open scrutiny. Everyone, including workers, gets a better result from a better decision making process,” said Australian Council of Trade Unions President Ged Kearney.
The call for a review follows the failure of the federal plan to open a national radioactive waste site at Muckaty in the Northern Territory.
“The Muckaty community is the latest in a line of Aboriginal communities at multiple sites across South Australia and the NT who have taken action against remote dumping plans,” said Natalie Wasley from the Beyond Nuclear Initiative. “The approach of the past two decades has failed to deliver and it is time for a new approach.”
The majority of Australia’s existing radioactive waste is currently stored at two secure federal sites. Waste set to return in 2015 from reprocessing in France is already slated for storage at one of these sites. The signatory groups see this as providing the federal government with an opportunity to do things differently and better.
“Radioactive waste is a difficult issue, but not an impossible one,” said Australian Conservation Foundation spokesperson Dave Sweeney.
“Radioactive waste lasts far longer than any politician so we need to get the management of this material right – the best way to do this is through open and evidence based policy and planning.”
Further Comment:
Dave Sweeney 0408 317 812
Natalie Wasley 0429 900 774
MEDIA RELEASE 13 October 2014
Melbourne, Australia: Wednesday 03 September 2014: Australian and Indian medical doctors have urged a re-think on planned uranium sales ahead of Prime Minister Abbott’s visit to India on Thursday 4th September 2014. The doctors recently met on 27 -29 August at the congress of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNWi) in Astana, Kazakhstan and represent Indian Doctors for Peace and Development and the Medical Association for Prevention of War (Australia). Continue reading
Abbott’s Olympic dodge on environmental protections The Australian Greens say the Abbott Government is shirking responsibility by waiving a new environmental impact statement for the proposed expansion of Olympic Dam.
“The Federal Government needs to do its job and stop putting the private profits of the big mining companies ahead of the environment,” said South Australian Greens Senator Penny Wright. “This is a short-sighted measure, which shows how little the Government cares about environmental protection.”
Senator Wright said BHP’s original environmental impact statement did not mention acid leaching but there were serious concerns around about this process in South Australia, with previous leaching in a copper mine near Copely resulting in leaks and contamination.
“We need to be sure that chemical pollution from BHP’s trial will be contained. If the Federal Government is cutting corners, what’s to stop BHP from skimping on environmental protections?
Senator Wright urged the Weatherill…
View original post 46 more words
Australia – uranium and nuclear power, Online opinion By Helen Caldicott -, 26 August 2014
“………… an ardently pro-nuclear group in Adelaide has arisen led partly by Barry Brook a Professor of Climate change at Adelaide University, who is an adamant supporter of uranium mining and nuclear power in Australia and is promoting small modular reactors http://www.huffingtonpost.com/helen-caldicott/small-modular-reactors_b_5653378.html.
To make matters worse former Prime Minister Bob Hawke is advocating that Australia enrich uranium and become the repository for the world’s nuclear waste. “We would get an enormous stable flow of income which could be used for the benefit of the world and our own benefit” he says. Nuclear waste must be isolated from the environment for 1,000,000 years according to the US Environmental Protection Agency – a scientific impossibility.
These people clearly do not understand the carcinogenic and medical dangers arising at all stages of the nuclear fuel chain, nor…
View original post 106 more words
Environmental Injustice in Australia – Nuclear Waste, The Stringer, by Kate O’Callaghan, May 8th, 2014 Muckaty Station is a small township in the remote Northern Territory, 110km north of Tennant Creek and roughly 800km south of Darwin. Also known as Marlwanpa, the land is held under Native Title having formally been returned in 2001 to thetraditional owners – the Milwayi, Ngapa, Ngarrka, Wirntiku, Kurrakurraja, Walanypirri and Yapayapa peoples. Muckaty is also the proposed site of Australia’s first national nuclear waste dump or, as it’s officially called, radioactive waste repository.
View original post 495 more words